Project Reports

Aubry, T., Jamshidi, P., Sylvestre, J., Shah, D., & Cherner, R. (2016). Preliminary Analysis of the Outcome Questionnaire Data from the Quick Response Counselling Program at Family Services Ottawa.

Aubry, T., Bourque, J., Volk, J., Leblanc, S., Nolin, D., & Jetté, J., At Home/Chez Soi Project: Moncton Site Final Report, Calgary, AB: Mental Health Commission of Canada

Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services. (2015). CRECS 15TH Year Anniversary Report.

RMSA Technical Cooperation Agency. (2015). Guidelines for Teacher Continuous Professional Development for RMSA.

Cherner, R., Sylvestre, J., Rae, J., Jette, J. & Aubry, T., Evaluation of the implementation of the Ottawa Supportive Housing for People with Problematic Substance Use Program. Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa, Centre for Research on Community Services

Cousins, B. J.& Hind Al Hudib. (2015). Global review of research and practice of teacher continuous professional learning and collaborative inquiry in schools.

Cousins, J. B.& RMSA Tream. (2015). Formative Evaluation of RMSA Teacher In-service Training: Volume 1, Main Report, 2 Case Studies, 3 Technical docs.

Cousins, J. B. (2018) Evaluation of Gamgard: A tool to identify gaming risks to vulnerable players under ‘normal’ playing conditions. Ottawa: Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services.

Cousins, J. B. (2015). Review of Evaluation Processes for Responsible Gambling Programs: Nova Scotia Provincial Lottery and Casino Corporation FINAL REPORT.

Daigle, M.-P., Sanders, S., Vandette, M.-P., & Aubry, T. (2019). Graduate Students’ Mental Health: Results and recommendations from a needs assessment of psychology graduate students at the University of Ottawa (pp. 1–172) [School of Psychology’s ad hoc Mental Health Working Group].

You can find a link to the executive summary here.

Enns, A., Kristjansson, E., Milley, P., O’Sullivan, T. Participatory evaluation of the programs and services of the Parkdale Food Centre. Report produced for the Parkdale Food Centre, May 2017. (10 pages)

Goering, P., Veldhuizen, S., Watson, A., Adair, C., Kopp, B., Latimer, E., Nelson, G., MacNaughton, E., Streiner, D., & Aubry, T.National At Home / Chez Soi Final Report. Calgary, AB: Mental Health Commission of Canada.

Heath, S., Svensson, K., Sylvestre, J., & Kane, R. (2017). Evaluation Framework for the Parent Engagement Strategy as a priority component of the National Strategy on Inuit Education: Parent Engage Evaluation Framework - Getting Ready for Evaluation.

J. B. Cousins, J. Whitely, Support for building innovative practice initiative: Request for services No 1062: Final Report, Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services, Ottawa

Jamshidi, P., Shah, D., Cherner, R., Aubry, T., & Sylvestre, J. (2017). An Evaluation of the Implementation and Outcomes of the Family Services Ottawa (FSO) Quick Response Counselling (QRC) Program.

Kane, R.G.; Orders, S.; Cousins, J.B.; Whitley, J.; Radford, J.; Butler, J.; Gagnon, F.; Pema, E.; Rottmann, J.; & Sutherland, S. (2015). Evaluation of the Ontario Ministry of Education’s School Support Initiative.

Kerman, N., Sylvestre, J., & Aubry, T. (2017). An Evaluation of Citizen Advocacy’s Matching Programs.

Kestens, Y., Rondier, P., Aragonés, L., Thierry, B., Naud, A., Cantonotti, M., Côté-Lussier, C., Margulius, D. (2015). Revitalisation commerciale et verdissement Pascal/Lapierre: Processus et impacts. Montréal: Directeur de santé publique de Montréal.

Macdonald, M., Mediell, M., El-Bahkiry, Yusuf, E., & Aubry, T, An Evaluation of the Equity and Inclusion Lens Training Program at the City of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa, Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services

McGreggor H, B Szijarto B, Svensson K, Heath S, Sylvestre J. & Kane, R.(2017). Evaluation framework for the parent engagement strategy as a priority component of the National Strategy on Inuit Education.

Rattelade, S, Bassi, A., Sylvestre, J., & Aubry, T., Youth in Transition Program: Implementation Evaluation Report, Ottawa, Canada: University of Ottawa, Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services

Shulha, L. M., Whitmore, E., Cousins, J. B., Gilbert, N., & Al Hudib, H. (2015). Evidence based principles to guide collaborative approaches to evaluation: Technical report. Ottawa: Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services, University of Ottawa.

Sylvestre, J., Kerman, N., Polillo, A., Lee, C.M., Aubry, T., & Czechowki, K. (2016). A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Family Homelessness.

Szijarto, B., Svensson, K., Heath, S., McGregor, H.E., Sylvestre, J., & Kane, R. (2017). Evaluation Framework for the Parent Engagement Strategy as a priority component of the National Strategy on Inuit Education: Parent Engagement Strategy – Stakeholder Diagram and Logic Model.

K. Weegar, A. J. Hickey, S. Shewchuk, M. Fall, & R. J. Flynn. (2016) A Formative Evaluation of Two Crown Ward Education Championship Teams in Ontario. Ottawa: Centre for Research on Educational and Community Services, University of Ottawa.

In 2015-2016, the authors carried out a formative evaluation of two Crown Ward Education Championship Teams (CWECTs) in Eastern Ontario. The first CWECT was operated by the local Children’s Aid Society (CAS) of Highland Shores and the CAS of Frontenac, Lennox and Addington. The second CWECT was operated by the CAS of Lanark, Leeds, and Grenville and the CAS of Renfrew County. Our formative evaluation aimed to help improve the two local CWECTs by examining their stakeholder needs, intended human and financial resources, activities, services, and desired outcomes. Our formative evaluation was also designed to prepare the way for a later outcome evaluation. We also hoped that the evaluation would contribute to the improvement of the province-wide CWECT program, which does not appear to have benefitted from any previous evaluation. Between 2008 and 2012, the provincial CWECT initiative grew from a pilot program that involved only a few CWECTs and sponsoring CASs into an Ontario-wide program of 21 CWECTs and some 40 CASs. The evaluation noted both the strengths and limitations of the two CWECTs and formulated 42 recommendations to improve them as well as the province-wide CWECT program. The final evaluation report, which is accessible to visually impaired readers, may be placed on its own web site by any other CWECT, CAS, or other organization.